Qantas defends Geoff Dixon's payout
QANTAS defended its executive remuneration today, as proxy votes indicated a huge protest vote against its remuneration report.. Wed Oct 2009 02:10 (5 months ago)
The Australian Aviation News 2840 articles in collection Read Full Article | Share with Friend
Related articles
-
4 months
after- Virgin Blue targets Qantas with new CEO - Business Day
-
8 hours
after- Qantas shareholders can't stop payout - The Australian Aviation ...
-
4 hours
after
-
1 hour
after- Qantas defends Dixon's remuneration - Sky News Business
- Qantas defends Dixon's remuneration - Bigpond business & ...
-
23 minutes
after- Qantas defends Dixon 's remuneration - Yahoo!7 Finance News
-
5 minutes
after- Qantas shareholders register opposition to Dixon payout - The West Australian ...
-
1 hour
before- Qantas defends executive pay - Business Day
-
1 week
before- Questions by the plane load for Qantas AGM - Crikey
- Qantas: The chance for answers goes west - Crikey
- Dixon pay may cause shareholder revolt: report - Business Spectator Alan ...
- Qantas holders revolt on pay - The Australian - ...
-
3 weeks
before
-
4 weeks
before- How Geoff Dixon’s millions grounded Qantas - Crikey
- Qantas chief left with $11m payout - Business Spectator transport ...
- Qantas CEO's $11m flight - The Age
- Qantas chief left with $11m payout - The Australian - ...
- Qantas executives pay questioned - PM
- Dixon's $11m parachute from Qantas nosedive - Yahoo!7 Finance News
-
1 month
before- Dixon paid $11m in Qantas departure - The Australian Business ...
-
2 months
before- Qantas business blitz to hit Virgin - Business Spectator transport ...
- Qantas makes shift in course - Business Spectator transport ...
- Joyce rules out Qantas merger - Sydney Morning Herald ...
- Qantas makes shift in course - The Age
- Aviation faces slow take-off - The Australian Aviation ...
Related Research Reports
Organisations mentioned
People mentioned
Article Profile
| Sentiment | |
|---|---|
| Access | Publicly available |
| Audio | No |
| Video | No |